Score
Check your copy before it ships
A piece of copy can read perfectly well and still break three rules you care about. Marketing teams in regulated spaces know the feeling: the line sounds great, legal sends it back, and the round trip costs a week. The question worth answering is the one you can ask before anyone signs off. Does this copy meet our own standard?
Scoring answers it on text you already have. Paste the finished line, score it against a compliance rubric backed by your regulation documents, and read a per-clause verdict. No model generates anything; the judge reads your words and reports where they conflict with your rules.
Pick the strongest phrasing
Choosing between two taglines usually comes down to whoever argues hardest in the meeting. Three drafts of a clause, four versions of a support reply, the same thing: a decision made on taste, defended on gut. Scoring offers a different way to settle it. Paste the versions, score each against one standard, and read the ranking with the reasoning attached.
You supply the candidates and a rubric. Each candidate is scored independently against the same criteria, and a winner is called. Nothing is generated, so the only thing being judged is the writing you already have.
You don't need to generate to evaluate
Every evaluation tool starts by running a model. You give it a prompt, it generates an answer, and then it scores what came out. That is the right shape when the thing you want to judge does not exist yet. It is the wrong shape when you already wrote the thing.
Most of the time, you have the text. A tagline is sitting in a doc. A support reply is drafted and waiting to send. A clause is written and you need to know if it holds up. You do not want a model to generate anything. You want a judgment on the words you already have.