Skip to content

Your team's standard, in every conversation

· 3 min read

Ask five people on a team whether a piece of copy is good and you get five answers, each run against a slightly different idea of the standard. One checks tone, another checks claims, a third goes on instinct. The copy is the same; the yardstick keeps changing.

A shared preset fixes the yardstick. When the check is a saved configuration everyone can invoke by name, the standard stops being a matter of who looked at it. In practice, a decision that used to stall can close in the thread it started in.

#campaign-launch Chat
M
Mara
proposed hero line: "the fastest way to prove your AI is production-ready."
J
Jon
i like it, punchy.
E
Elise
same, works for me.
S
Sam
'fastest' makes me nervous, that's the kind of claim comms flagged last time.
M
Mara
@llmprover does this line meet our marketing-standards?
●●● scoring the line against the marketing-standards rubric and regulation docs...
●
llmprover bot
75/100. One flag: 'fastest' is an unbacked superlative (clause 1.3). Everything else passes. Drop 'fastest' or back it with a cited figure and it clears.
S
Sam
called it. drop the superlative: 'prove your AI is production-ready, before you ship.'
M
Mara
that clears it. yep, make that change and run with it.

Three people reacted on instinct and split two-to-one. Instead of the loudest voice winning, one message put the line against the team’s saved standard, and the answer settled it: one named flag, a clear fix, shipped. The standard did the deciding, not the debate.

One vetted check, invoked by name

That worked because “marketing-standards” is one thing, built once. The rubric that captures what the team cares about, and the regulation documents the claims are measured against, were settled up front and saved as a preset. From then on anyone runs the same check.

A shared marketing-standards preset

  • One rubric the team agreed on, not five private ones.
  • One set of regulation documents every check is measured against.
  • Invoked by name from the dashboard or a plain-language ask, so running it takes no knowledge of how it was built.

The person running the check does not need to know how it was configured. They name it, supply the copy, and read a verdict measured against the same standard a teammate would have used an hour ago. The consistency is the point: the answer to “is this good?” no longer depends on who is asking.

Give your team one standard to run

Save a vetted preset once and everyone invokes the same check. Presets are on Pro and above.

Get started on Pro

Why this compounds

A standard that lives in one person’s head leaves when they do, and drifts while they stay. A standard saved as a preset is durable and visible. When the rule changes, you update the preset once and every future check uses the new version, with no retraining and no stale copies floating around in people’s habits.

That is the quiet value of a shared preset. It turns a judgment that used to vary by reviewer into one vetted check the whole team runs the same way, in whatever tool they happen to be in.

Presets are on Pro and above. Save your team’s standard once, and everyone runs it the same.

presets mcp compliance